Skip to Content

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall recently filed a 20-state amicus brief in an effort to shield Amish communities in rural New York from state-sponsored backlash for exercising their religious freedoms. The legal action holds New York accountable for leveling “massive penalties” on Amish only private schools in rural New York in response to parents of the students electing, for religious reasons, not to vaccinate their children in accordance with the state’s vaccine mandates.

The brief was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and specifically alleges that New York violated the First Amendment rights of parents to exercise their religion and raise their children according to their deeply held beliefs. Almost every other state in the country accommodates religious objections to school vaccine requirements.

“New York has so little regard for religion that it will seek out, harass, and threaten Amish communities that want only to live out their faith amongst themselves,” Marshall said. “Parents should not be forced to choose between their children’s schooling and their fundamental rights. Unfortunately, we’re seeing a growing trend of hostility toward religious liberty. I was shocked to learn that members of the New York legislature had called such religious beliefs ‘fake’ and ‘garbage.’

“We need to resist this hostility before it infects the federal courts too.”

RELATED: Alabama AG files lawsuit to block Biden’s proposed radical gender policies in schools across America

The states taking part in the brief argue that the First Amendment was designed to protect religious minorities, like the Amish. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly defended parental rights in the areas of religious education and the religious upbringing of one’s children. The brief also explains that the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York wrongly found that New York’s repeal of religious accommodations was “neutral and generally applicable.”

Additionally, they believe that the law discriminates against religion because it permits students to be unvaccinated, so long as they give “health” reasons, not religious ones.

The legal representatives of the group of states emphasized that public health is not a legitimate reason to trample on the rights of conscience, and they fear that States like New York and the federal government will continue to encroach on these essential freedoms.

The Alabama-led coalition also included: Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia.

Austen Shipley is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on X
@ShipleyAusten

7. Trump organization found guilty of tax evasion

6. Alabama election may be challenged over “scribbles”

5. Yawn.

4. Potential legislative agenda on economic development has leadership support

3. Twitter files drama continues

2. COVID-19 mandates on the military nearing their end

1. Warnock win, Democrats hold 51-49 lead in U.S. Senate for 2 years

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday to uphold the right of U.S. Air Force members to seek religious exemptions to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, chairman of the Republican Attorneys General Association, was joined by attorneys general in 22 other states in filing a September brief in support of the airmen’s case.

In hailing the court’s decision, Marshall asserted that Air Force personnel should not have to sacrifice religious liberty while serving in the Armed Forces.

“An airman may sacrifice much serving his country. That sacrifice should not include his right to religious liberty,” said Marshall. “We have protections in place to ensure that an Airman enjoys largely the same rights to religious liberty as his fellow citizens. Those include the Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

“This appeals court ruling underscores that the religious liberty of Air Force personnel cannot be trampled by the government.”

RELATED: COVID-19 mandate and federal overreach crusader: AG Steve Marshall

The attorney general detailed that after the Air Force mandated service members receive the COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 10,000 branch personnel requested exemptions on religious grounds. According to Marshall, the Air Force granted only 135 exemptions, with most that qualified having been scheduled to retire soon after.

“[I]n February, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of Air Force service members seeking religious-liberty exceptions to the vaccine mandate,” he said. “In March, a federal district court ruled in their favor, placing a preliminary injunction barring the Air Force from disciplining any member for claiming a religious-liberty exemption to the vaccine mandate.

“After the Air Force appealed the federal district court ruling, I joined with 20 fellow attorneys general in supporting the statutory and constitutional rights of the Airmen who were denied their rights. The victory this week in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ensures the injunction protecting religious exemptions will continue in effect for Air Force members, including those on active duty, in the reserves, in the Air National Guard, and in the Space Force.”

Alabama’s chief law enforcement officer and the 22 other attorneys general filed a brief in April before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Defense Department’s similar failure to grant religious exemptions for military personnel from COVID-19 inoculation.

Marshall also filed an August brief supporting Navy personnel’s right to seek religious exemption from the branch’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Alabama was joined by Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming in filing the brief.

Dylan Smith is the editor of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

The state of Alabama will be immune from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) expected decision to add the COVID-19 shot to the agency’s Vaccines for Children Program.

A CDC advisory committee voted Wednesday to recommend the COVID-19 shot’s addition to the program, which would make the vaccine free for children across the United States. The agency is anticipated adopt the recommendation today.

While the CDC’s action could make the shot mandatory for children in many states, Alabama is shielded from the decision due to state law. States hold the ability to determine whether or not the CDC’s scheduled vaccines for children are required for school admittance.

Attorney General Steve Marshall told Yellowhammer News the addition of a new vaccine has no impact on Alabama’s inoculation schedule due to the state non-adherence, statutorily or by practice, to the CDC’s current schedule.

NOTE: The CDC’s vote this week on child immunizations and the COVID-19 vax will not impact Alabamians. Read up on our law here: https://t.co/F2UJFXC9EB

— Attorney General Steve Marshall (@AGSteveMarshall) October 20, 2022

Senate Bill 267, passed by State Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur) in May 2021, banned vaccine passports in the Yellowhammer State. Included in one of the bill’s provisions is the prohibition of public schools requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination for students.

Shortly after the bill was signed into law, Marshall issued a public notice detailing the law’s interpretation.

“[N]o government, school, or business in Alabama may demand that a constituent, student, or customer, respectively, be vaccinated for COVID-19 or show proof of his or her vaccination for COVID-19,” the attorney general’s notice stated.

Dylan Smith is the editor of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

“We Dare Defend our Rights,” reads Alabama’s official state motto. This maxim was put to the test during the Biden administration’s COVID-19 mandate campaign.

Emerging as a champion against federal overreach, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall employed every legal option at his disposal to combat federally instituted masking and vaccination decrees.

For his efforts, Marshall became subject to routine criticism from liberal in-state media and left-wing ideologues.

Undeterred by the political left’s opposition to his fight, Marshall insists that “if I worried about social media, I wouldn’t be doing this job very long.”

In a recent conversation with Yellowhammer News, Marshall detailed Alabama’s efforts to combat the administration’s unconstitutional pandemic-era decrees.

Nearly a year has passed since President Joe Biden announced his administration’s intentions to utilize the power of the federal government to mandate vaccination upon vast portions of the American public.

“One thing that we knew very quickly, not only in our office but our colleagues around the country, is that we would be part of this pushback against what we believed, and now has been confirmed, were the illegal actions of the administration,” said the attorney general.

When asked what the governing party’s motivations were in issuing the edicts, he suggested that they were acting on the concept that the federal government holds the power to embark on such an ambitious policy quest.

“I think the motivation is this belief that the federal government gets to make all the decisions, and that’s just simply not the way our constitutional structure works,” Marshall advised. “And specifically, within the context of federalism is the idea that a majority of the authority to govern the day-to-day lives of the people are left to the states and not the federal government as a whole.”

While garnering no support from left-wing media, Marshall noted the overwhelming support his office received from Alabamians over its fight against the administration’s pandemic rules.

“It’s almost universal support,” he said. “I can’t tell you how many times I get stopped by people on the street, people that I see at the grocery store say, ‘Thank you for being willing to engage in that fight.’ … My job is to follow the rule of law and to embrace the sovereignty of Alabama to make decisions.”

According to Marshall, the administration’s actions were blatant assaults on state sovereignty. When such an infringement occurs, the attorney general declared that it is his duty to combat it.

“And when you see our Legislature clearly does not engage in any effort to legislate in this area that has historically been the role of states to decide inoculation regimes or vaccine policies involving its citizens, for the federal government to suddenly attempt to exercise power there, you know it’s my responsibility to push back,” he said.

For Marshall, utilizing the courts to push back against federal overreach extends well beyond COVID-19 mandates.

“Although much of the discussion here is kind of about vaccines and the overreach of the federal government, part of the reason we engage in these fights is not only the specific issue that’s involved and whether or not that violates the law, but also it’s really continuing to draw the line in the sand with the federal government about their authority and their ability to impact decisions that go on at the state level,” he said.

“To the extent we don’t fight, every time we give the federal government and inch they’re going to take a yard,” Marshall said. “And so, when we fight the spectrum of these cases, not just in the vaccines but in the cases in which we’re involved, there’s a broader policy of federalism and the rule of law in play. I think it’s very important for Alabama’s voice to be heard.

“I’m very pleased that I have the opportunity to work with colleagues across the country as we have these various battles.”

Dylan Smith is the editor of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

7. Joe Biden was on a tear last night, it was pretty crazy

6. Gay pride flags come down in Madison City Schools

5. Nurses in Tuscaloosa are about to go on strike

4. Tourism could generate about $24 billion in Alabama

3. Lawsuit challenging electronic vote counting

2. Alabama’s Democrat candidate for governor has lost an endorsement somehow

1. Marshall is joining suit against military vaccine mandates

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall announced Monday he had filed an amicus brief to a lawsuit on behalf of U.S. military personnel against the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

The U.S. Navy SEALs v. Biden lawsuit features 35 Navy service members, who are assigned to Naval Special Warfare Command Units, challenging the administration’s vaccine decree on the basis of First Amendment protections.

The plaintiffs, who were not granted a religious exemption from the edict, are asserting their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment’s free exercise clause.

In a statement announcing the brief’s filing, Marshall railed against the progressive administration’s “heavy-handed approach” to its mass vaccination campaign.

“Perhaps more than any other of President Biden’s vaccine mandates, his heavy-handed approach has been most profoundly felt by the U.S. military,” said Marshall in a release. “Just over a year ago, military personal were ordered to begin taking COVID-19 vaccinations and many who asserted religious objections to the vaccine were summarily denied. Records indicate that while more than 4,000 Naval active duty and reserve sailors submitted requests for religious accommodations, all but a few dozen had their requests denied.”

According to Alabama’s chief law enforcement officer, service members are entitled to religious exemptions from forced vaccination.

“Many thousands in uniform are being denied their constitutional rights by the Biden administration’s blanket refusal to grant their wishes for religious exemption from the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate,” he said. “U.S. military personnel deserve and are indeed entitled to the same First Amendment protections of their religious liberties as any other American citizen.”

Marshall joined state attorneys general from Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming in filing the brief before the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Dylan Smith is the editor of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

Last Friday, a federal appeals court ruled that the Biden administration cannot enforce its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors in the state of Alabama.

Due to its participation in a lawsuit seeking to halt the mandate, Alabama, along six other states and the Associated Builders and Contractors, will be free from the decree’s enforcement.

In the ruling, which was issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, the three-judge panel’s majority outlined that only the parties that joined the lawsuit would be granted relief from the administration’s mandate.

Issued by the White House in September 2021, Executive Order 14042 dictated that certain federal contractors mandate their respected workforces to become vaccinated against COVID-19.

The following month, Attorney General Steve Marshall joined a lawsuit with the six other state attorneys general in an effort to prohibit the “lawless and authoritarian” mandate’s implementation in their respected states’ jurisdictions.

The lawsuit alleged that the edict was “untenable” for state agencies that perform contract services for the federal government. The plaintiffs pointed to the “billions of contracting dollars” that could be in jeopardy if the contractors fail to comply with the executive order.

In a statement celebrating the ruling, Gov. Kay Ivey said Friday the court’s decision was a victory for “common sense.”

“Here in Alabama, we continue to fight for common sense, and today’s ruling is another win for not only common sense, but for freedom,” she said. “Many Alabamians, myself included, were strongly opposed to these outrageous mandates, and we fought back and won. I am proud to continue standing up for Alabamians.”

Dylan Smith is the editor of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden administration required all troops and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) personnel to become inoculated against the virus.

Earlier this year, Republicans in Congress unsuccessfully attempted to pass a bill to rescind the vaccine mandate and reinstate any members of the military who were separated from service due to noncompliance with the decree.

U.S. Rep. Barry Moore (R-Enterprise), unrelenting in the fight against the requirement, recently led a letter to DOD Secretary Lloyd Austin asking him to rescind the mandate in wake of the latest easing of requirements by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“To ensure the continued safety and readiness of our country’s bravest men and women,” the letter reads, “and to reflect the most up to date guidelines released by the CDC, we request that the military immediately reverse it’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement for all military personnel and civilian contractors. We also request that those who were unfairly forced to separate from the military be given the option to be reinstated with back pay.”

Along with the letter, Moore also released a statement calling service members being terminated over the vaccine mandate a “purge of patriots.”

“With updated CDC guidance for the unvaccinated, the Department of Defense’s final fig leaf justifying its purge of patriots for refusing vaccination has been stripped away,” said Moore. “During a time of global turmoil and missed recruitment targets reaching the level of a national security crisis, the military has absolutely no justification for sacrificing readiness in favor of virtue signaling and the appeasement of this administration’s political base. The military vaccine mandate must end, and all our servicemembers so cruelly separated due to this disastrous policy must be rehired with full backpay.”

Woke Pentagon policies are purging patriots from our military and leading to recruitment shortages approaching the level of national security crisis. With the government’s own science no longer justifying a military vaccine mandate, Secretary Austin must side with servicemembers. https://t.co/0zG6PQut5Y

— Rep. Barry Moore (@RepBarryMoore) August 23, 2022

Joining Moore’s letter were U.S. Reps. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.), Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), Ben Cline (R-Va.), Randy Weber (R-Texas), Bill Posey (R-Fla.), Greg Steube (R-Fla.) and Byron Donalds (R-Fla).

Yaffee is a contributing writer to Yellowhammer News and hosts “The Yaffee Program” Weekdays 9-11am on WVNN. You can follow him on Twitter @Yaffee

As an increasing number of Alabama academic institutions are opting to remove mask mandates, Gov. Kay Ivey on Friday called for the remaining schools and universities that have such requirements to end forced mask-wearing.

The governor pointed to the state’s COVID-19 data, which she said indicated that mask mandates were no longer necessary for students.

“I applaud the Alabama schools and universities who have made the decision to end mask mandates,” stated Ivey. “Given the health data we’ve seen in Alabama and across the country, I encourage all schools to continue removing these mandates — we don’t need them in Alabama.”

Ivey asserted that parents should have the final say for their children in the mask debate and touched on the state’s successful legal fight against the Biden administration’s COVID-19 mandates.

She added, “As a former teacher, I know well that parents should be in charge of making the best decisions for their kids, not government. That’s why here in Alabama, we don’t have covid state government mandates — we sued President Biden over his mandates, and we won. I believe in the good people of our state and will always protect their freedoms.”

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

7. Second union vote in Bessemer in underway

6. Joe Rogan under fire for the same thing Joe Biden did

5. Invasion could happen any day, but criticizing the U.S. approach is Russian disinformation

4. Marshall files new lawsuit against Biden mandates

3. Allow exceptions to constitutional carry

2. School choice push could be too late this year

1. Hospitalizations are falling

When protesters were rampaging through American cities, the American media looked at the carnage and pretended the people protesting were “mostly peaceful” despite the images to the contrary.

When Americans, and now Canadians, protested mandates, the media heavily implied the motives were hateful and the results were chaotic.

This is not new. It lines up directly with how the media treated the Tea Party with disdain and heaped praise upon the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Watch:

Dale Jackson is a contributing writer to Yellowhammer News and hosts a talk show from 5-9AM weekdays on WVNN and on Talk 99.5 from 10AM to noon.

7. Katie Britt: U.S. should back out of Beijing Olympics 

6. There’s another variant

5. Biden vaccine mandate is pulled as new vaccine is being developed

4. Troops could be sent to Europe soon

3. Ukraine sovereignty must be defended, U.S. sovereignty is another story

2. Coronavirus relief spending plan advances

1. Regulate and tax gambling in Alabama

As the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments earlier this month in consideration of the legality of President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 private employer vaccine mandate, a petition filed by the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) and its Alabama chapter proved influential in the court’s decision to strike down the edict.

Mandated through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the rule instructed businesses with 100 or more employees to adopt a vaccine-or-test rule for their workers. If employees opted against accepting the COVID-19 vaccine, they would be forced to undergo regular virus testing and wear a mask while on the job.

Concerned that the rule would harm its membership, ABC filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court challenging the Biden administration’s mandate. ABC argued on behalf of Alabama’s construction industry that the OSHA rule would have adverse effects on the labor force, contending that it would intensify the issue of skilled labor shortage in the state and across the nation.

The association also argued that the mandate would serve to exacerbate the national supply chain crisis and further increase the cost of essential materials. ABC argued that the penalties applied to companies that were found to be in violation of the OSHA rule would harm both employers and employees alike.

Upon considering ABC’s appeal and weighing the validity of other arguments brought before the high court, justices ruled the OSHA private employer vaccine decree to be unlawful by a 6-3 vote.

According to ABC of Alabama president Jay Reed, the Supreme Court’s decision to rule against the administration’s vaccine mandate was a victory for the construction industry and asserted that jobs would not be adversely impacted by what the association deemed to be an overreaching edict.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling lessens restrictions on our member firms and safeguards their ability to perform their projects successfully and provide jobs for their employees across Alabama,” stated Reed. “We’re pleased with the Court’s decision to strike down the Biden Administration’s overreaching vaccine-or-test rule for businesses. The responsibility for making decisions regarding COVID-19 protocols should be in the hands of individual businesses—not the federal government.”

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

Gov. Kay Ivey on Thursday issued a response over the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling against President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private employers.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) decree forced businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for its workers or force them to regularly test for the virus.

The high court’s conservative justices, who outnumber the liberal justices six to three, ruled the Biden administration’s OSHA rule to be beyond the scope of the executive branch’s powers.

In her State of the State address earlier this week, Ivey outlined the state’s efforts to defeat against the Biden administration’s vaccine edicts. On Thursday, the governor commended the Supreme Court for halting the mandate’s enforcement.

“During my state of the state address earlier this week, I reaffirmed my commitment to fighting back against D.C. overreach and calling out their political games and nonsense when I see it,” noted Ivey. “Ever since the White House rolled out their scare tactic plans to try to force the COVID-19 vaccine on Americans, I assured the people of Alabama that we were standing firmly against it.”

She continued, “I said that we would win this battle in the courts, which is why I supported Alabama taking legal action against the Biden Administration’s failed attempt to mandate this vaccine. Today, the Supreme Court gave us a major victory by stopping OSHA’s vaccine mandate for large employers from going into effect.”

While celebrating the court striking down the private employer vaccine decree, Ivey conveyed her dissent to its decision to uphold the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) vaccine mandate for health care workers.

Ivey concluded, “However, I completely disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision to let the mandate on health care workers move forward. At a time when hospitals around the country are experiencing shortages and burnout in staff, why would they then run more off with an overreaching mandate by the president? I do not believe the White House is equipped to tell health care professionals they know better when it comes to medical advice.”

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

Thursday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major defeat to President Joe Biden as it struck down his administration’s private employer COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

The mandate, implemented through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), forced businesses that employ more than 100 workers to force vaccination upon its workforce or subject them to regular virus testing.

The court voted six to three along ideological lines to halt the mandate’s enforcement.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall in early November filed a legal challenge on behalf of the state against the president’s decree.

Marshall in a statement commended the court’s ruling prohibiting the president’s private employer vaccine edict from going into effect.

“I applaud the U.S. Supreme Court’s stay of Biden’s private-employer vaccine mandate, which affects the greatest number of Americans. This is a win for the Constitution over the most overreaching of Biden’s unlawful, unconstitutional, and un-American mandates, which sought to force some 80 million employees to submit to vaccinations or lose their jobs,” proclaimed Marshall. “As I noted when Alabama filed its legal challenge to the private-employer vaccine mandate, not only is this mandate based on a faulty public health premise—that workplace immunization will stop the spread of COVID-19—but it is based on an utterly flawed legal premise as well.”

He added, “As the Supreme Court majority opinion stated succinctly: ‘Although Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly. [The private-employer vaccine mandate] certainly falls in the latter category.’

While the high court blocked the Biden administration’s OSHA decree, it upheld the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) health care worker vaccine mandate. In mid-November, the State of Alabama filed suit against the CMS mandate.

Marshall expressed his disappointment over the court’s decision allowing the health care worker mandate to remain in effect.

“I am, however, greatly disappointed with the Court’s decision regarding the Biden administration’s healthcare-worker vaccine mandate,” stated the attorney general. “As with the private-employer vaccine mandate, the healthcare-worker vaccine mandate far exceeded any power Congress gave the administration, and the mandate will cause many frontline healthcare workers to find new work, precisely at a moment when hospitals around the country are struggling to find doctors and nurses.”

Marshall indicated that by the Supreme Court upholding the mandate, its enforcement could hold adverse consequences for the state’s health care industry.

“By allowing this vaccine mandate to continue, the Court has further empowered the federal administrative state, eroded state sovereignty, and likely guaranteed worse health outcomes in Alabama and beyond, as overburdened healthcare workers are stretched thinner still,” asserted Marshall.

Republican-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who have served as swing votes in multiple cases, joined the court’s liberal justices in upholding the edict.

Marshall conveyed his support for the court’s conservative justices’ dissent in which they pointed to the constitutionally-limited powers of the federal government’s executive branch as to why they voted against the mandate’s enforcement.

The attorney general concluded, “As Justice Alito, joined by Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett, explained in dissent: ‘Today’s decision will ripple through administrative agencies’ future decision making. The Executive Branch already touches nearly every aspect of Americans’ lives. . . . Neither CMS nor the Court articulates a limiting principle for why, after an unexplained and unjustified delay, an agency can regulate first and listen later, and then put more than 10 million healthcare workers to the choice of their jobs or an irreversible medical treatment.’”

Republican members of Alabama’s congressional delegation applauded the court striking down Biden’s private employer COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

According to U.S. Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Haleyville), the Biden administration’s issuance of the mandate was a prime example of federal overreach.

“The Supreme Court made the right decision. The employer mandate issued by the Administration was too broad and heavy-handed – a one-size fits all requirement that did not take into account the realities of workplaces and our economy,” stated Aderholt. “I’m thankful we have a high court that will rein in this type of government overreach.”

U.S. Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Hoover) declared the ruling to be a victory for personal health care autonomy.

“This decision from the Supreme Court is a huge win for limited government and individual liberty,” stated Palmer. “A person’s right to make their own health decisions does not disappear during a pandemic. This OSHA mandate was an egregious example of government overreach. No one should be compelled by law or burdensome regulation to receive a vaccine that they do not want, for whatever deeply held reason.”

He added, “The concurring opinion of the Court confirms the concerns a number of my colleagues and I raised in a letter to OSHA a few months ago. OSHA simply does not have the authority to mandate individuals to act against their personal beliefs and undergo forced vaccinations. As the opinion states: ‘[OSHA would have] almost unlimited discretion—and [there would be] no “specific restrictions” that … “fully constrai[n]” the agency.’”

#SCOTUS reaffirms what Republicans have said all along – @POTUS' employer vaccine mandate is an abuse of executive power and unconstitutional. The vaccine decision should be made between patient & physician – & it shouldn’t be a question of take it or get fired.

— Coach Tommy Tuberville (@SenTuberville) January 13, 2022

 

Great news! SCOTUS has blocked the Biden administration's unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private businesses.

Americans in the private sector should have never faced the threat of losing their jobs due to presidential overreach. https://t.co/1f5dqwCOB3

— Mike Rogers (@RepMikeRogersAL) January 13, 2022

🚨BREAKING: The Supreme Court just blocked the Biden administration's unconstitutional vaccine mandate for businesses with over 100 employees. The American people will not stand for Biden's vaccine mandate. The final battle is not over – I will keep fighting for our freedoms!

— Rep. Barry Moore (@RepBarryMoore) January 13, 2022

Bam!

Supreme Court blocks Biden OSHA vaccine mandate, allows rule for health care workershttps://t.co/bUt3etK0DM

— Jerry Carl (@CarlForAlabama) January 13, 2022

Great news! https://t.co/Bs4m4m7Zrz

— Gary Palmer (@USRepGaryPalmer) January 13, 2022

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

Monday, Attorney General Steve Marshall officially qualified his candidacy for reelection at the Alabama Republican Party headquarters in Birmingham.

Marshall, while making official his bid to serve a second term as Alabama’s chief law enforcement officer, outlined his office’s priorities over the next four years.

“It has been a privilege to serve as Attorney General for the last five years. Being Attorney General is a professional passion of mine to be able to work with law enforcement in our state,” stated Marshall. “There is still work to be done, and I’m looking forward to the opportunity to serve another four years.”

The attorney general pointed to his support of enabling law enforcement to effectively combat rising crime rates and made mention of his efforts to shield Alabamians from the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

“Number one, doing the things we need to do to support Alabama law enforcement to keep Alabama communities safe. Over the last year, we’ve seen a rise in violent crime,” added Marshall. “We want to be very proactive in giving law enforcement the opportunity to deal with those issues. Second, we will continue to defend Alabama’s sovereignty. As recently as last week, being engaged in the push back against the Biden vaccine mandates and to be able to make sure that we defend Alabama’s ability to make decisions about what’s best for the people of this state.”

The primary election will take place May 24, 2022.

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

7. Infrastructure improvements coming to Huntsville

6. Cuomo won’t be charged in nursing home deaths

5. Judge orders in favor of Navy Seals in vaccine lawsuit

4. The Capitol isn’t any safer than last year

3. Battle over firearm permits ratchets up

2. Booster shots can now go to those as young as 12

1. 10-day quarantine is here to stay in Alabama

Republican U.S. Senate candidate Mike Durant on Monday announced that his campaign this week will launch an “Alabama First” tour in an effort to bring his message directly to voters across the state.

A first time candidate for public office, Durant thus far has centered his campaign’s messaging around him being a “political outsider.” In his bid to replace the retiring U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), Durant is running on what he refers to as his “real-world experience” as a military veteran and business owner.

The “Black Hawk Down” U.S. Army aviator and Huntsville defense contractor has placed an emphasis on targeting President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates, an issue which polling has indicated to be of importance to the Republican base.

According to a release from his campaign, Durant’s “Alabama First” tour will see the candidate continue to speak on halting vaccine mandates, protecting constitutional rights and taking aim at “career politicians.”

In announcing his campaign’s tour, Durant stated his intentions to take his outsider’s message directly to the grassroots.

“In Washington, career politicians who have never had a real job make awful decisions that hurt middle-class families and small businesses in Alabama,” proclaimed Durant. “I’m running for Senate to change that. We need leaders with the real-world experience to get the job done.”

He concluded, “Like President Trump, I’m a political outsider. I’ve spent my life defending our country and building a successful business. I look forward to traveling around our state and talking with Alabamians who are ready for new leadership in Washington.”

Durant on Tuesday will officially qualify to appear on the Alabama Republican Party ballot as a candidate for the open U.S. Senate seat at the party’s Birmingham headquarters.

The primary election is scheduled to occur on May 24, 2022.

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

7. Race being used to consider who receives treatment

6. Alabama still has $1.5 billion in coronavirus relief funds to spend

5. January 6 is the media’s new favorite holiday, and they will celebrate all week

4. Possible victory on vaccine mandates is getting closer

3. Wild weather over the last few days for Alabama

2. Stop going to the ER for a coronavirus test

1. Omicron-related changes for schools 

The State of Alabama this past weekend scored another legal victory against the Biden administration as a federal court awarded the state an injunction against its Head Start COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates.

Attorney General Steve Marshall in late December joined 23 other states in filing a lawsuit in the Western District of Louisiana to block the administration’s mandates. The lawsuit was led by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

The mandates would have forced Head Start program employees and volunteers to become vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, the mandates would have required Head Start pupils as young as two-years-old to wear face coverings for a majority of the time while attending preschool.

In reacting to the injunction, Marshall noted that the federal court order was handed down on New Year’s Day, something he advised to be of rare occurrence.

“Once again the federal executive branch has overstepped its legal authority to make laws and once again a federal court has agreed with the State of Alabama that such overreach is unconstitutional and should be stopped,” stated Marshall. “In a rare New Year’s Day order, the Western District Court of Louisiana enjoined the Biden administration from enforcing its vaccine mandate for Head Start workers and its mask mandate for toddlers.”

Marshall’s office stated that the Alabama Department of Human Resources and the Alabama Department of Early Childhood Education, as well as the state’s Head Start teachers, staff, volunteers and students would have been affected by the mandates.

Marshall asserted that the legal victory would ensure that Head Start programs would be able to maintain rather than terminate staff members who chose to not comply with the mandates.

“The order affects 24 states, including Alabama, which brought suit against the mandate. This victory will help ensure that numerous Head Start programs will continue to operate rather than have to fire teachers and cut back services to children,” he added. “And this win will forestall the nonsensical and damaging practice of forcing masks on two-year-olds.”

According to the attorney general’s office, the court “bluntly noted” that the administration’s move to circumvent Congress in issuing the mandates was “more fitting a monarch than a president.”

“The issue in this case is not whether individuals should take the COVID-19 vaccine, but whether federal agencies can mandate individuals to take a vaccine or be fired,” continued Marshall. “In this Court’s opinion, the Executive branch has declared it has the authority to make laws through Federal agencies. A crossroad has clearly been reached in this country. If the Executive branch is allowed to usurp the power of the Legislative branch to make laws, then this country is no longer a democracy—it is a monarchy.”

Alabama’s chief law enforcement officer indicated that the administration’s move to bypass Congress to implement the mandate violated the U.S. Constitution’s arrangement of separated governmental powers.

“This two-year pandemic has fatigued the entire country. However, this is not an excuse to forego the separation of powers. If the walls of separation fall, the system of checks and balances created by the founders of this country will be destroyed,” declared Marshall. “In the words of Thomas Paine, ‘Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.’ Common Sense (1776).”

The attorney general concluded, “This issue will certainly be decided by a higher court than this one. This issue is important. The separation of powers has never been so thin.”

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

The fate of President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates could soon be forged as the U.S. Supreme Court is set to take up the controversial decrees.

The nation’s high court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on January 7 regarding legal challenges to the Biden administration’s private employer and health care worker COVID-19 vaccine rules.

Thousands of Americans are expected to descend upon the nation’s capital in late January to protest the administration’s vaccine edicts. The effort has been dubbed “Defeat the Mandates — an American Homecoming.” The movement’s organizers assert that the effort was organized by a diverse group of Americans who fear their jobs could be at risk should Biden’s vaccine mandates become implemented.

The protesters’ sentiments mirror those held by a large share of Alabamians. A poll conducted in October showed that nearly 65% of the state’s citizenry was opposed to mandated COVID-19 vaccination.

In its efforts to shield the citizenry from the Biden mandates, the State of Alabama adopted both legal and legislative strategies to combat what it considers to be executive overreach.

In late October, Gov. Kay Ivey issued an executive order which directed all entities under the authority of the state’s executive branch to coordinate with the Alabama Attorney General’s office to support vaccine mandate-related litigation that the state would bring against the federal government.

Just days after the governor issued her executive order, Attorney General Steve Marshall filed suit on behalf of the state to block the Biden administration’s federal contractor COVID-19 vaccine mandate. According to Marshall, the rule is not presently enforceable as Alabama recently emerged victorious in achieving a nationwide injunction against the decree.

Nearly a week after the first lawsuit was filed, Marshall issued a legal challenge against Biden’s private employer vaccine edict. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rule requires employers with 100 or more employees to force vaccination upon its workers or subject them to weekly virus testing.

Additionally, the State of Alabama in mid-November filed a lawsuit to block the enforcement of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers.

As the high court nears its hearing date regarding the private employer and health care worker vaccine edicts, Marshall recently expressed optimism that the Supreme Court would rule that the administration overstepped its legal authority in issuing the mandates.

Alongside Alabama challenging Biden’s vaccine decrees in the judicial system, state lawmakers in early November opted to address the issue in a specially called session of the Alabama Legislature. While the special session was necessary to address the decennial redistricting process, lawmakers came to the conclusion that legislation was needed to solidify protections for those who could be adversely impacted by the mandates.

The supermajority Republicans enjoy in the legislature allowed for the passage of Senate Bill 9, authored by State Sen. Chris Elliott (R-Daphne), which directed Alabama employers to “liberally construe” workers’ exemption requests from COVID-19 vaccination.

On the federal level, Republican members of Alabama’s congressional delegation have, through legislation or other means, attempted to block and defund the administration’s COVID-19 vaccination rules. However, such attempts have been to no avail as Democrats currently control both chambers of Congress and the White House.

The State of Alabama is seeking to score a major victory, along with a number of other Republican-led states, in defeating the Biden administration in what has been one of the most controversial political issues of 2021.

Many observers believe the Supreme Court’s current makeup to be favorable to opponents of the mandates as the bench’s conservative justices hold roughly a six to three conservative majority.

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

7. Unruly airline passenger is not Rosa Parks

6. Fauci says the United States should have a vaccine requirement for air travel

5. Coronavirus quarantine time cut in half

4. New coronavirus cases double in Alabama over the last week

3. Brooks and Britt agree that Mobile community should get final say in I-10 toll bridge

2. Battle over constitutional carry will pit lawmakers against sheriffs

1. Biden acknowledges the main tenet of his campaign was garbage

7. Biden extending student loan moratorium

6. State Rep. Greer continues pushing to eliminate ‘good time’ releases

5. Mobile likely to vote against constitutional carry

4. Club for Growth endorses another congressman in Alabama

3. AG Marshall filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration

2. Alabama could lose the College Football Playoff without playing a game

1. First at-home treatment for coronavirus approved